Monday, September 9, 2013

CONTRACT REVIEW, according to Dilbert

REVISIÓN DEL CONTRATO, según Dilbert



Created by Scott Adams, Dilbert is about the world's most famous -- and funny -- dysfunctional office


Interdisciplinary Consulting Firm whose Mission 
is to provide integral, operational and efficient solutions, 
in all areas related to Strategic Management, Investments, 
Education Management and Training for Latin American Countries, 
focused on: 
a) Health, Pharma & Biotech Industry, 
b) Industrial & Services' Companies, 
c) Universities & Training Centers, 
d) Government, NGOs & NPOs.


MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
is in Facebook: www.facebook.com/MSG.LatAm
and now also in Twitter: @MSGLatAm


Link to MEyGC - Graduate Course in 
Strategic Management and Change Management:


Link to GOSyF - Graduate Course in 
Health and Pharma Organizations' Management:


Please visit us. We`ll be waiting for you !!!


Contact:
Dr. Miguel Angel Medina Casabella, MSM, MBA, SMHS
CEO at MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
Postgraduate Career Director & Professor
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
Founder & ViceChairman, GWAA LatAm Chapter
Former Coordinator & Professor, HSML Program for LatAm
The George Washington University
Work Phone: ( 0054) 11 - 3532 - 0510
Mobile Phone (Domestic): ( 011 ) 15 - 4420 - 5103
Mobile Phone (Int´l): ( 0054) 911 - 4420 - 5103
Skype: medinacasabella

Consultora Interdisciplinaria especializada en 
Management Estratégico, Gestión del Cambio, Inversiones, 
Gestión Educativa y Capacitación de Latinoamérica,
para los Sectores:
a) Salud, Farma y Biotech,
b) Industria y Servicios,
c) Universidades y Centros de Capacitación,
d) Gobierno y ONGs.


MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
está en Facebookwww.facebook.com/MSG.LatAm
y ahora también en Twitter@MSGLatAm


Algunas de Nuestras Propuestas de Capacitación
(en UTN é IN COMPANY)


Taller de ESTRATEGIAS EFECTIVAS para ESCENARIOS TURBULENTOS: 



MEyGC 2013 - Curso Universitario en 
MANAGEMENT ESTRATÉGICO y GESTIÓN DEL CAMBIO:



GOSyF 2013 - Curso Universitario en 
GESTIÓN DE ORGANIZACIONES DE SALUD y FARMA:


Visítennos. Los estaremos esperando !!!


Contacto:
Dr. Miguel Angel Medina Casabella, MSM, MBA, SMHS
CEO at MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP LatAm
Postgraduate Career Director & Professor
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
Founder & ViceChairman, GWAA LatAm Chapter
Former Coordinator & Professor, HSML Program for LatAm
The George Washington University
Work Phone: ( 0054) 11 - 3532 - 0510
Mobile Phone (Domestic): ( 011 ) 15 - 4420 - 5103
Mobile Phone (Int´l): ( 0054) 911 - 4420 - 5103
Skype: medinacasabella







Wednesday, September 4, 2013

21st century Leadership Learnings from 2,500 years ago: Aristotle's Guide to Virtuous Leadership

by Deb Mills-Scofield


Diversity is finally getting beyond discussions of race and gender to include experiences, talents, and ways of thinking. I’d like to add another type of diversity to the conversation — virtues. More than 2,500 years ago, Aristotle “created” the Virtues as a guide to leading a “happy life.” They still hold true; that’s why they’ve lasted this long!
Look at your organization, your teams. You see people with a mix of traits; some are very courageous, others conservative; some live and breathe customer delight, others obsess with operational excellence. These are examples of the classic virtues — the Greek four of courage, justice, prudence and temperance, and the Christian three of faith, hope and love (or charity). Let’s define them and see how having a diversity of virtues can apply in your organization and your teams to help you grow.
Courage
  • Definition: It takes courage to challenge the status quo, to try something untried, to propose unprecedented solutions. Most disruptive innovations (products, services, supply chain, operations, management) take a lot of courage. Courage recognizes opportunity and leads change while managing risk (smart risk).
  • Application: Do small, quick experiments, prototypes and tests, refine and do it again and again to discover the best solutions. This way, you mitigate risks rather than avoid them so you can learn from failure and have the courage to experiment-learn-apply iteratively. This means you and your culture accept smart failures and move forward.
  • Who? This shouldn’t just be marketing or R&D. Who on your team is courageous? In what ways? Does the team (and you) listen or dismiss them? Do you have a process for mitigating risk that doesn’t squash innovation? Do you have enough courageous people to do what you need to do?
Faith
  • Definition: Faith equals trust, which is based on our experience, on promises kept. It is increased with authenticity and honesty. It assumes worth (value) and worthiness (valuable) is aligned. Is Google’s market cap based on its computer servers and communication networks or on its algorithms, people, corporate culture and the belief, based on past experience, they will continue to produce worth, value.
  • Application: Faith is your people’s trust in you and your customers’ trust in your brand. The entire customer experience, hence your whole organization, has to live up to that trust. It means you are transparent, you align resources to truly delight your customers and you are accountable and responsible.
  • Who? Who do you trust on your team? And who trusts each other, at all levels? Why are they trusted? How can you model that? Fundamentally, every single member of your team, your organization should be trustworthy — this is a virtue that all should embrace!
Hope 
  • Definition: Hope is tied to faith. Hope looks ahead to the future and is rooted in facts, not fantasy. It balances the possible with the probable. Hope is based on experience, learning and application, so there must be freedom to fail. Learning from failure helps determine fact from fiction.
  • Application: Hope is realized how you innovate — how you get ideas into the pipeline, vet them, test them and support the people involved. There are many tools for doing this, including giving people time to imagine, dream and try. The more “at bats” you have, the more chances of getting all the way around and back to home plate. It’s about best practicing, not best practices.
  • Who? Just as faith, ideally all your team members should have and give hope. How many people on your team say “Yes, and” instead of “Yes, but” or an outright “No”? This is not to imply we don’t question and analyze (which we will see with temperance and prudence).
Justice 
  • Definition: Justice is the difference between fair and equal. Justice also applies the triple bottom line to innovate solutions that are meaningful and effective and preserve the environment — think of Patagonia, Toms of Maine, and Whole Foods. This directly affects your brand’s reputation.
  • Application: Justice directly gets to compensation. Do you reward your people fairly or equally? This affects morale, productivity and the customer experience. Justice also means that having the right doesn’t make it right. Justice asks you to look at things from your customer’s perspective, not from your own. Do the ends justify the means? Justice accounts for your organization’s total impact — on people, planet and profits; on leaving things at least as good as you found them.
  • Who? This is not just an HR issue. Who on your team thinks holistically of the impact of their area on other areas of the business? Are there structural/organizational inhibitors to acting justly?
Love 
  • Definition: Aristotle defined love in 3 ways: Eros (passion), Philos (friendship) and Agape (sacrifice, servant leadership). Think of “Voice of the Customer,” “Voice of the Employee,” and “Voice of the Community.” Passion is exhibited through excellent customer service (e.g., Zappos), social capital and servant leadership.  Love is all about creating and sustaining authentic customer value.
  • Application: Eros is a passion for delighting your customer all the way from how they find your stuff, order it, get it, deal with customer service, unpack it, install/use it and potentially get rid of it (which ties into justice!). Philos is how you treat your employees and your suppliers — with respect, honesty and the freedom to take risks to better the business and delight the customers. Agape is how you lead — is it about you or about the “other”?
  • Who? This isn’t just sales! What are your people’s passions? Are they aligned with their jobs? Are your team’s passions varied enough to compliment each other or are they so focused on one area that others are neglected?
Prudence
  • Definition: Prudence is about empowering people so the organization is agile and adaptable. This affects who and how you hire, train, develop and free your talent. It means you balance short, medium and long terms. It’s about assessing outcomes andoutputs and can require courage. Prudence means your people know, and can impact, the processes and rules of the road and knowing “when to hold ‘em and when to fold ‘em.”
  • Application: Prudence gets to your decision-making process. Do you look at the bright spots (what’s working) as well as the dull spots (what’s not working) and ask why and why not? Do you align your people’s strengths and passions with their responsibilities as best you can? Apply lessons from the past without imposing them on the future. Do you question the underlying assumptions and validate them?
  • Who? Who on your team is prudent? Are they in a decision-making position, guiding direction? Are they free to question assumptions without being dismissed?
Temperance
  • Definition: Temperance is Greek for “the middle way,” moderation, balancing competing interests. It applies to work-life fit, stakeholders, team’s diversity, policies for consistency but not constraint, long versus short term and accountability versus authority.
  • Application: Temperance gets to how you give your people the freedom to perform excellently and have a life. It’s about balancing accountable and responsible with the authority to act. It is demonstrated in your innovation processes. How well does your organization balance competing interests? What are your barriers to temperance? Do you give your people the time and space to innovate and learn?
  • Who? This shouldn’t just be the CFO and the use of a balanced scorecard. You need people with temperance to balance the passion for customer delight with sustained profitability to continue to delight! As for work-life fit, your team is the role model for the organization.
This isn’t a numbers game — you don’t need to make sure you have each virtue on the team and you may have more of one than the other. Take a project your leadership team is involved in and identify what virtues are most critical to the project’s success. Identify how to turn that into action for each member of the team without personalizing it.
Fuente: SmartBrief

COMPLICATED ISSUE, according to Dilbert

ASUNTO COMPLICADO, según Dilbert




Created by Scott Adams, Dilbert is about the world's most famous -- and funny -- dysfunctional office

Monday, September 2, 2013

4 Great Reasons why Jeff Bezos is buying 

The Washington Post

Most people were stunned to learn that Bezos paid $250 million to buy the storied but troubled Washington Post. The newspaper suffered a 44 percent drop in revenue over the past six years. Inscrutable as ever Bezos was vague about his intentions. But it’s likely he’ll bring some Amazon management techniques to the Post and encourage experimentation without regard for short-term profits and losses.

No one knows for certain thinks Stone, but expect to see that his overarching goal will be to create a thriving new media species on the digital frontier.

Writing for Business Insider for which he is also an investor Henry Blodget sees some similarities between the digital news business and his e-commerce business no one in the news business has really capitalized on yet. Exactly what are these similarities are is expanded in his commentary:

Digital news and e-commerce businesses can be something that no traditional competitor can be: infinitely broad and infinitely deep. Stores and traditional media properties are limited by space constraints: They either have to be specialized, like Best Buy or Automotive Week, or, generalists, like Wal-Mart or the current Washington Post. Digital businesses don’t have those constraints. They can be both broad and deep.

“Another similarity is that digital news and e-commerce businesses can be deeply personalized. Just as every return visitor to Amazon sees a different front page, every return visitor to a news site can be presented with a different story selection.

A third similarity is that, in commerce and media, you don’t have to own the whole market to do well. Tech businesses tend to be winner-take-most. Media and commerce, meanwhile, are vast, fragmented markets in which a small share can eventually become a big business (so you don’t have to totally dominate to win).

Lastly, I’d guess that Jeff Bezos thinks there are many ways in which the news business might be complementary to Amazon.

In addition, Blodget advances four reasons why he believes that the Post’s news business may be complementary with Bezos’ Amazon:
  1. Amazon is already in the content production and distribution business — and news is just another kind of content. Amazon distributes massive amounts of print and digital content. The content the Washington Post publishes and distributes could be bundled or distributed with that content. And, similarly, the content that Amazon produces — mainly commerce-related, but increasingly media — could be integrated with the Washington Post’s content, offering more choices for customers and consumers.
  2. Amazon is already in the subscription and media-gadget businesses. Subscribers to Amazon’s “Prime” delivery service already get to watch free movies and TV shows. Amazon Kindle buyers already have access to free books. It’s easy to imagine that Prime subscribers and Kindle buyers will soon have convenient, free access to the Washington Post — and that this access might make a Prime subscription or Kindle ownership more valuable. Washington Post reporters, meanwhile, could produce an endless supply of e-books and Kindle Singles.
  3. “News” is the digital equivalent of a high-traffic intersection: As people pass through to figure out what’s happening they might also stop to do some shopping. Content and commerce companies have long dabbled with combining the two experiences, but no one has really nailed it. Given Amazon’s expertise in affiliate marketing and advertising, it’s not hard to imagine that the Washington Post could quickly become a laboratory for the next generation of integrated content and commerce.
  4. Amazon is getting into the local physical delivery business — a business that the Washington Post is already in. Could stuff ordered from Amazon be delivered with your morning newspaper? Why not? And your daily newspaper — or parts of it — could certainly be delivered in a box with your Amazon stuff. I doubt that Bezos is really interested in the print version of the Post, but as long as it exists, it might be fun to fiddle with.

In short, there are lots cool synergies that Jeff Bezos and Amazon might want to experiment with”.
Fuente: Chief Executive

WORTHLESS, according to Dilbert

CARENTE DE VALOR, según Dilbert




Created by Scott Adams, Dilbert is about the world's most famous -- and funny -- dysfunctional office


Haciendo click en el link de abajo, accederás a los Contenidos del

Programa Ejecutivo en PENSAMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO

http://msg-latam-meic.blogspot.com.ar/2014/03/programa-ejecutivo-en-pensamiento.html

INICIA Lunes 21 de Abril de 2014 en UTN, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional

Consultar por opción IN COMPANY a: msg.latam@gmail.com